Spicy Scandal: Indian YouTuber Arrested for Peacock Curry Video!
Description:
An Indian would-be social media star has been arrested and detained after outrage by his video of cooking and eating the country’s protected national bird, a peacock, police said. Police said that Kodam Pranay Kumar was detained Monday and sent to jail after “other videos in his mobile phone confirmed” that the bird he’d cooked for his curry dish video was indeed a peacock. The colourful birds are protected under stringent wildlife laws. “He is now in jail on 14 days remand under the Wildlife Protection Act,” the police said. Kumar, who has a small following on social media platform, posted a video of his cooking adventure, in which he captured the entire process of plucking, cleaning, marinating, cooking and eventually consuming the peacock.
Effects on Individuals:
This incident serves as a reminder that social media influencers and content creators have a responsibility to be aware of the laws and regulations in their respective countries. Creating content that goes against wildlife protections can lead to legal consequences, as seen in the case of Kumar. Individuals must be mindful of the impact their actions can have on protected species and the environment.
Effects on the World:
Instances like this highlight the need for increased awareness and education on wildlife conservation and protection. The outrage sparked by Kumar’s video sheds light on the importance of preserving endangered species and respecting wildlife laws. It serves as a wake-up call for society to be more conscious of the consequences of their actions on the environment and biodiversity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the arrest of the Indian YouTuber for cooking a peacock in his video serves as a cautionary tale for both individuals and the world at large. It emphasizes the significance of upholding wildlife protections and environmental conservation efforts. Moving forward, it is essential for content creators to be responsible and considerate in their actions, ensuring that they do not harm or exploit protected species for the sake of views or engagement.
